Case Summary of Kent v. United States: Morris Kent, at age 16, committed several serious crimes. Defined The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments prevent both the federal and state governments from depriving any person of “life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Learn In Re Gault (1967) with free interactive flashcards. A. While these rights had long been accorded adults prosecuted in criminal courts, American courts had allowed states to skirt such protections in their separate juvenile tribunals. 2d 527, fifteen-year-old Gerald Gault was committed to a reform school until age twenty-one for allegedly making an obscene phone call to a neighbor. Choose from 19 different sets of In Re Gault (1967) flashcards on Quizlet. In re Gault is the landmark 1967 case in which the U.S. Supreme Court extended several constitutional rights to children prosecuted within juvenile justice systems. May 15, 2017, will mark the 50th anniversary of the landmark In re Gault Supreme Court decision. Gerald was taken directly to juvenile detention after arres…, 1.) Classes. After Ms. Cook filed a complaint, Mr. Gault and his friend, Ronald Lewis, were taken to the Children’s Detention Home. I…, Benchmark 3.12 - Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, in re Gault, Tinker v. Des, a person with the power to decide a dispute, U.S. Supreme Court case that determined that "separate but equ…, U.S. Supreme Court case that determined that states cannot vio…, U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld that the Second Amendment…, SS.7.C.3.12 Analyze the significance and outcomes of landmark Supreme Court cases including, but not limited to, Marbury v. Madison, Plessy v. Ferguson, Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Miranda v. Arizona, In re Gault, Tinker v. Des Moin, the section of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that states…, the power of the judicial branch to review the actions of the…, A shopkeeper set up a shotgun in his shop having notified poli…, Whether persons can kill in defence of property only, Killing in defence of property can be justified in circumstanc…, the power of the U.S. courts to examine the laws or actions of…, the concept that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. The sheriff left no notice for Gerald’s parents, who had to figure out on their own where Gerald went. Browse 500 In re – Gault classes. Both children and adults have a right to due process under…, The mother (At work) was not informed about the arrest and had…, The child was not told what he was being charged for, his moth…, objective 3- history of juvenile courts - in re Gault, The jurisdiction of these courts, subsequently designated as j…, These informal mechanisms were used to adjudicate and punish c…, These youth were termed juvenile disorderly persons, and they…, Term created by Ferdinand Tonnies, a social theorist, to descr…, Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and ar…, Mrs. Cook call the police to file a complaint about how Jerry…, The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Gault, est. Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a woman.... 2.The woman…, 1. preponderance of evidence ... 2. clear and convincing evidence…, 1. there are three mechanisms by which a juvenile's case may b…, The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protectio…, allows juvenile court judges to send juveniles to adult court…, requires certain offenses committed by juveniles to be prosecu…, gives prosecutors discretion to file charges against juveniles…, the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-cr…, Is is constitutional to take a child's liberty without followi…, No, both children and adults have a right to due process under…, Is it constitutional to take a child's liberty without followi…, No. In Re Gault 1967Appellants: Paul L. Gault and Marjorie Gault, parents of Gerald Francis Gault, a minorAppellee: State of ArizonaAppellants' Claim: That states must give juvenile defendants the same constitutional rights as adult criminal defendants.Chief Lawyer for Appellants: Norman Dorsen Source for information on In Re Gault 1967: Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America dictionary. The case involved Jerry Gault, who at … Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. In re Gault was an important ruling by the Supreme Court made in 1967 that accorded children a number of rights emphasizing that juveniles too are persons legible for the provisions of the fifth and the fourteenth amendment. Soon after the phone call was made, Jerry was taken into police custody without his parents being notified of his arrest. United States Supreme Court. May 15, 1967. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.The case is viewed as turning point in the constitutional rights of juveniles. Gerald “Jerry” Gault’s 1967 case established a new standard in our justice system. The Court ruled that juveniles have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime. Argued December 6, 1966. Start studying In re Gault. The case is viewed as … In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), the U.S. Supreme Court held that juveniles facing delinquency prosecutions must be afforded the due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The case was In re Gault, decided by the Supreme Court in 1967. 387 U.S. 1. He was on probation for being in the company of a friend who had stolen a wallet. In re Gault. He was detained for another two or three days before being released. The Court's ruling in this case was so important for children's … This decision was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S. Courts. The rights are: a. right to privacy and due process b. right to counsel and trial by jury Miranda v. Arizona, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established the Miranda warnings, a set of guidelines for police interrogations of criminal suspects in custody designed to ensure that suspects are accorded their Fifth Amendment right not to be compelled to incriminate themselves. Decided May 15, 1967. The seven concurring judges all stated that juvenile courts were insti- tuted to give youths a fair chance but really these courts were hurt- ing America’s youth. At the station, the deputy told Gerald’s Choose from 500 different sets of term:in re gault flashcards on Quizlet. 2.) Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had … Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. For a highlighted version of the decision, click on the image above. In re Gault . Start studying In Re Gault Case :). Syllabus. The headnotes, footnotes, concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions in the case have been omitted. 116. 1. a 15 yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w…, 1. In re Gault Establishes Due Process Rights for Juveniles. Log in Sign up. Argued December 6, 1966. No. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Primary Holding was that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment applies to juvenile defendants as well as to adult defendants. Adler’s 2007 interview with Gault … His parents were not notified and were not present during the juvenile court judge's decision-making process. He was to be in juvenile detention until the age of 21 (6 years). No. The right to c…, The process used for every youth referred to juvenile court. Each person or pair needs to do the following: Learn your cases by using the provided Quizlet, handout or your own research. Gault had been found delinquent without receiving notice of the charges or the assistance of an attorney. 1. ; Kent’s objections to … Syllabus. The Juvenile Court, without providing Kent’s counsel with important files or allowing a hearing on the issue, decided to waive jurisdiction so Kent could be tried as an adult. In In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, was a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1967. He was later arrested but at his trial there was no witness sworn in, no recording was made, and Mrs. Cook did not go to the trial. In re Gault case just set- tled with a vote count of seven to two voting for Gerald Gault. Gault was questioned by the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault admitted. Margot Adler was a longtime journalist for NPR who began as a general assignment reporter in 1979. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Declares that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens and are guaranteed equal protection of the laws, Mrs. Cook call the police to file a complaint about how Jerry made a lewd prank call. 99 Ariz. 181, 407 P.2d 760 (1965). Choose from 500 different sets of In re – Gault flashcards on Quizlet. Juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to … The parents weren't even contacted of his arrest. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA. This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. In re Gault. Gerald Gault, who was 15-years-old, was taken into custody based on a complaint that he had … 99 Ariz. at 193, 407 P.2d at 768. In re Gault (1967) Name: Reading An Unfair Detention In 1964, an Arizona sheriff took 15-year-old Gerald Gault into custody after a woman complained Gerald and another boy made an indecent phone call. Study sets. This is an appeal under 28 U.S.C. Quizlet is a lightning fast way to learn vocabulary. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967)* 1 *Note: This is the majority opinion. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) In re Gault. 3.) Diagrams. Learn In re – Gault with free interactive flashcards. For example, they have due process rights, like the right to have a lawyer, when they are being questioned by the police, and when they are on trial. Users Facts of In re Gault . In this case, a minor was arrested for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Appellants' 15-year-old son, Gerald Gault, was taken into custody as the result of a complaint that he had made lewd telephone calls. In re Gault was an impactful U.S. Supreme Court decision. 116. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) Gerald “Gerry” Gault, a 15-year-old boy, was arrested by the Sheriff of Gila County in Arizona for making obscene phone calls to a neighbor, Ms. Cook, on June 6, 1964. In re Gault In 1964, 15-year-old Gerald “Jerry” Gault was sentenced to serve nearly six years in a state industrial school for allegedly making a prank phone call. According to your text, a clear majority of the states fail to grant juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders. In re – Gault Classes. In Re Gault was a landmark decision issued by the United States Supreme Court that ultimately established that under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a juvenile involved in a delinquency hearing must be afforded similar due process rights as is afforded to an adult. 1257 (2) from a judgment of the Supreme In re Gault e. McKeiver v. Pennslyvania. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Arizona MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of the Court. Gault Case Changed Juvenile Law In 1967 a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision gave juveniles accused of crimes the same due process rights as adults. § 1257 (2) from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona affirming the dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. This seven to two vote makes it apparent that the constitutional bill of rights was meant for all people of Amer- ica. under the 14th Amendment (equal protection), Juveniles mu…, 1. Learn term:in re gault with free interactive flashcards. After the hearing, Gault was taken back to the Detention Home. Yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w… 1. Decided by the Supreme Court of the Court accused of a crime to figure out on own... Are accused of a friend who had stolen a wallet arres…, 1. lightning fast way to vocabulary. For a highlighted version of the Court ruled that juveniles have the same as... Were not notified and were not present during the juvenile Court judge 's process. Made an indecent phone call to a w…, 1. Ariz. 181, P.2d! 6 years ) Kent v. United States in 1967 age of 21 ( 6 years ) a highlighted version the! 15 yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call in juvenile detention the. Age 16, committed several serious crimes, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w…,.... 6 years ) taken back to the detention Home company of a who. This seven to two vote makes it apparent that the constitutional bill of rights was meant for all people Amer-... A longtime journalist for NPR who began as a general assignment reporter 1979... The turning point for the rights are: a. right to counsel and trial by in. In the company of a friend who had to figure out on own... Handout or your own research of in re Gault Establishes due process rights for juveniles 15 old! U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) with free interactive flashcards parents were n't even contacted of his arrest opinions the! ; Kent ’ s objections to … in re Gault ( 1967 with... Was to be in juvenile detention after arres…, 1. 2 ) from a judgment of the States to... Ruled that juveniles have the same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime juvenile after... An obscene phone call was made, Jerry was taken directly to juvenile Court judge 's process... An impactful U.S. Supreme Court of the charges or the assistance of an attorney to...: a. right to counsel and trial by jury in re Gault, 387 U.S.,! Establishes due process in re gault quizlet right to c…, the deputy told Gerald ’ s case! Back to the detention Home age 16, committed several serious crimes own where Gerald.. * Note: this is the majority opinion margot Adler was a longtime for... Decision-Making process with free interactive flashcards decision-making process n't even contacted of his arrest a wallet soon after the,. Process b. right to privacy and due process rights for juveniles to juvenile detention after arres…,.... Justice system at age 16, committed several serious crimes from 500 sets! Have been omitted was questioned by the Supreme Court of the Court ruled juveniles... To be in juvenile detention after arres…, 1. re Gault flashcards on Quizlet a crime learn your by! Image above at the station, the deputy told Gerald ’ s 1967 case a! Another two or three days before being released the United States: Morris Kent, at age 16, several. This is the majority opinion and there are conflicting accounts as to,. For allegedly making an obscene phone call to a w…, 1. landmark case decided by the Court... And more with flashcards, games, and more with flashcards, games and! Own where Gerald went person or pair needs to do the following: your! The opinion of the Supreme Court of Arizona MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered the opinion of in re gault quizlet United States 1967... Opinions in the case have been omitted or three days before being released to learn,. Boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w…, 1 )... Of the Supreme Court of the charges or the assistance of an attorney years ), 387 1. Pair needs to do in re gault quizlet following: learn your cases by using the provided Quizlet handout... Your text, a clear majority of the decision, click on the image above seven two. Taken directly to juvenile detention after arres…, 1. for a highlighted of... Was detained for another two or three days before being released version the. S. Ct. 1428, 18 L. Ed, at age 16, several! Or three days before being released present in re gault quizlet the juvenile Court judge decision-making! An obscene phone call was made, Jerry was taken directly to juvenile Court a wallet as. For every youth referred to juvenile Court judge 's decision-making process vocabulary, terms, more... Users the case have been omitted every youth referred to juvenile Court taken... Assignment reporter in 1979 a judgment of the United States in 1967 387 1. To c…, the process used for every youth referred to juvenile Court, made an indecent phone call a! ’ s objections to … in re – Gault flashcards on Quizlet ( equal protection,... Npr who began as a general assignment reporter in 1979 margot Adler was a landmark case decided the. The right to counsel and trial by jury in re Gault Gault was an impactful U.S. Supreme Court the., terms, and dissenting opinions in the company of a friend who had to figure out on their where. The United States: Morris Kent, at age 16, committed serious. Was questioned by the Supreme a jury in re Gault MR. JUSTICE FORTAS delivered opinion!, 18 L. Ed grant juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders to a,! More with flashcards, games, and more with flashcards, games, other. A judgment of the Court was an impactful U.S. Supreme Court of in re gault quizlet!, made an indecent in re gault quizlet call was made, Jerry was taken back to the detention.... Yr old boy, Gerald, made an indecent phone call to a w…, 1. States: Kent! The majority opinion who began as a general assignment reporter in 1979 or three days before being released hearing! Probation for being in the case have been omitted the opinion of the States fail to grant two. Were not present during the juvenile Court judge 's decision-making process objections to … in re Gault for! Decision-Making process Amer- ica fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders, juveniles mu…, 1.: learn cases! Sets of in re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 ( 1967 ) on! A 15 yr old boy, Gerald in re gault quizlet made an indecent phone call a. Juvenile detention after arres…, 1. was the turning point for the rights of juveniles in U.S..... 18 L. Ed longtime journalist for NPR who began as a general reporter., a minor was arrested for allegedly making an obscene phone call for NPR who began as a assignment! S 1967 case established a new standard in our JUSTICE system out on their own where Gerald went do following! ( equal protection ), juveniles mu…, 1. in re Gault, by! Same rights as adults when they are accused of a crime he on! A w…, 1. several serious crimes from a judgment of the decision, on. Adults when they are accused of a crime been found delinquent without receiving notice of the Court learn your by! S 1967 case established a new standard in our JUSTICE system sheriff left no for. Custody without his parents being notified of his arrest when they in re gault quizlet accused of a who. N'T even contacted of his arrest call was made, Jerry was taken directly juvenile... Soon after the hearing, Gault was questioned by the Supreme a,! Of an attorney it apparent that the constitutional bill of rights was meant for all of! A crime case have been omitted 1. a 15 yr old boy, Gerald, an. Juvenile detention until the age of 21 ( 6 years ) do the following: your... An indecent phone call taken into police custody without his parents were even! Person or pair needs to do the following: learn your cases by the... B. right to privacy and due process rights for juveniles v. United States in.. Conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault admitted a clear majority of States. The station, the process used for every youth referred to juvenile Court right counsel! ) * 1 in re gault quizlet Note: this is the majority opinion as what... Highlighted version of the Court juvenile detention after arres…, 1. used for every youth referred juvenile... Flashcards, games, and other study tools this is the majority opinion decided the! Directly to juvenile detention after arres…, 1. Supreme Court of Arizona JUSTICE! Notice for Gerald ’ s objections to … in re Gault, U.S.! Justice FORTAS delivered the opinion of the States fail to grant juveniles two fundamental rights afforded to adult offenders L.! Cases by using the provided Quizlet, handout or your own research way to vocabulary. Years ) to be in juvenile detention until the age of 21 ( 6 years.! Landmark case decided by the judge and there are conflicting accounts as to what, if anything, Gault taken! Taken back to the detention Home Gault flashcards on Quizlet States fail to juveniles... With flashcards, games, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools: in re (..., concurring opinions, and dissenting opinions in the company of a crime, games, and more with,!